Yellen Too Loud

The first trading day of the week was very lackluster with little to move the currency markets either way due to the Easter holiday break. This only helped to raise the anxiety level of traders as they waited for Tuesday’s speech at the Economic Club of New York by Fed Chair Janet Yellen. The question on everyone’s mind was did she mean to sound as dovish as she did in her post-FOMC press conference in mid-March, especially since various Fed presidents had taken a more hawkish tone since then. The answer is yes, she absolutely meant to sound dovish.

The third paragraph of her speech is very telling, it reads as follows: “In my remarks today, I will explain why the Committee anticipates that only gradual increases in the federal funds rate are likely to be warranted in coming years, emphasizing that this guidance should be understood as a forecast for the trajectory of policy rates that the Committee anticipates will prove to be appropriate to achieve its objectives, conditional on the outlook for real economic activity and inflation. Importantly, this forecast is not a plan set in stone that will be carried out regardless of economic developments. Instead, monetary policy will, as always, respond to the economy's twists and turns so as to promote, as best as we can in an uncertain economic environment, the employment and inflation goals assigned to us by the Congress." In other words, the Fed should proceed with caution and with a gradual approach in adjusting policy.

Ok, so Yellen stressed a “gradual approach” to Fed policy and, just in case the economy goes sideways or worse, the Fed is prepared to employ additional "money" printing (QE): "Even if the federal funds rate were to return to near zero, the FOMC would still have considerable scope to provide additional accommodation. In particular, we could use the approaches that we and other central banks successfully employed in the wake of the financial crisis to put additional downward pressure on long-term interest rates and so support the economy--specifically, forward guidance about the future path of the federal funds rate and increases in the size or duration of our holdings of long-term securities. While these tools may entail some risks and costs that do not apply to the federal funds rate, we used them effectively to strengthen the recovery from the Great Recession, and we would do so again if needed." Really, we are back to this again. How successful was QE anyway? Not very, considering QE1 was followed by QE2, Operation Twist, and QE3.

Here is another unsettling part of the speech: "The FOMC left the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged in January and March, in large part reflecting the changes in baseline conditions that I noted earlier. In particular, developments abroad imply that meeting our objectives for employment and inflation will likely require a somewhat lower path for the federal funds rate than was anticipated in December. Given the risks to the outlook, I consider it appropriate for the Committee to proceed cautiously in adjusting policy. This caution is especially warranted because, with the federal funds rate so low, the FOMC's ability to use conventional monetary policy to respond to economic disturbances is asymmetric." So what you’re telling us is that the Fed’s “data dependency” will now include data like Japanese inflation, European GDP, and Chinese PMI – you get the picture.

It appears that Janet Yellen is not only dovish but she is a lot more dovish than anyone previously thought. To illustrate this point, the ninth footnote in the text of her speech stated “uncertainty and greater downside risk” when the Fed’s policy rate is so close to zero “call for greater gradualism.”

At the time of this writing, fed funds futures traders have revised down the implied probability of a June rate hike to just 26%, and “only” a 66% chance of another rate hike at all this year.

In the currency trade, it’s no surprise the the USD took the brunt of Yellen’s dovishness as it lost ground to all the major currencies. During the past week, multi-month highs for the AUD, NZD, and CAD were recorded. The big question is will the gains in commodity currencies last – investors are seeing the spike highs and the natural inclination is to think of exhaustion followed by reversals.

In other parts around the world the yen is the best performing currency in Q1, which is surprising since the Bank of Japan decided to up the ante with the introduction of negative interest rates. The GBP was in last place which is not surprising as the currency is being weighed down by the uncertainty of Brexit. To underscore this point, the global manufacturing PMIs were released on Friday and the only one that missed its mark was from the UK where the PMI reading printed at 51 versus 51.2 forecast. By the way, the PMI for China surprised to the upside with manufacturing activity expanding for the first time in 8 months – does this mean Yellen will raise rates – sorry we’re confused.

US Federal Reserve Interest Rate Talk Again...

Honestly, after last week’s anticlimactic FOMC decision we thought
that we would get off this topic of interest rate hikes and move on to
other market drivers. Unfortunately, we demur as the issue has
come back, front and center, and is vying for top spot in the news
cycle along with the VW’s exhaust issues (food for thought: Chinese,
Indian or Korean automaker to buy Porsche from VW?). The USD was
able to pick itself up off the mat and finish at the top of the currency
heap last week. The week prior, the USD was down and out due to
the market’s perception of a dovish hold after the FOMC meeting.
Sound bites from several Fed officials and a speech by Chairperson
Yellen were able to transform the market’s perception from a dovish
hold to a hawkish hold. This policy stance is grounded in the fact that
most Committee members continue to project a policy rate increase
later this year, even though the conditions that led to a delay in a
September rate hike are likely to persist in the months ahead. Thus,
as long as U.S. policy normalisation remains on the table, the
divergence between the Fed and the continued monetary easing of
other central banks, especially the ECB and the BOJ, should continue
to cause the USD to trade with a strengthening bias.

The worst performers last week were the GBP and AUD. The GBP has
plainly run out of gas. The Bank of England is the only other central
bank besides the US Federal Reserve that is close to raising interest rates. There
wasn’t any key market moving data releases last week but there was
conflicting central bank commentary. Sir Jon Cunliffe asserted that
the UK’s economic outlook was ‘pretty strong’ and that the next interest rate related movement was likely to be an increase, however, fellow Monetary Policy Committee member Ben Broadbent stated that he wouldn’t be voting for higher borrowing costs anytime soon. Since the UK economy appears to have slowed in Q3, Broadbent’s comments carried more weight and helped the GBP fall by 2.5% last week. The focus for next week will be revisions to Q3 GDP and the PMI manufacturing report.
The other poor performer last week was the AUD. The AUD dropped below 70 cents intraday last week and is down about 20% over the last year primarily due to the China slowdown story and the slump in commodity prices. China is Australia’s biggest trading partner so any negative news about China’s economy tends to weigh on the AUD. Last week’s negative China news was the Caixin PMI, which showed that manufacturing activity contracting at the fastest pace since March 2009. The other driver of Aussie weakness last week was a report by ANZ Bank that suggested that the Reserve Bank of Australia may cut rates twice in 2016 taking the benchmark rate to 1.50%. If this were to happen, the next likely target on the monthly price chart would be around the 0.60 level last seen in late 2008.

The Big Tickle

All currencies rallied to the upside against the USD last week except for the euro after the Federal Reserve switched gears. The best performs were the commodity cousins, the aussie and kiwi, in the wake of the Fed’s indecision on an interest rate hike. The euro unwound its post-Fed rally the following day after European Central Bank policy makers noted risks to the global economy. Benoit Coeure, an ECB Executive Board member, said the Fed’s decision vindicates the ECB’s assessment of the uncertainties surrounding the global growth outlook while his colleague on the ECB board, Peter Praet, said in an interview with the NZZ newspaper that the ECB should be ready to act if economic shocks turn out to be long-lasting.

The big tickle for the week was the Fed’s policy shift. Most were probably not surprised that the Fed left rates unchanged at their FOMC meeting last week. That makes it 55 straight meetings without a change in interest rates. The surprise came in the Fed’s reasoning for its inaction – its concerns that developments in the global economy and markets could “restrain US economic activity somewhat”. This change emphasizes that global growth concerns are a real concern, which may cause a risk off environment to develop.

We guess we can call this move a “dovish hold”.

The Fed also released its dot plot plan after the meeting. The plot shows the projections of the 16 members of the Federal Open Market Committee (the rate-setting body within the Fed). Each dot represents a member’s view on where the fed funds rate should be at the end of the various calendar years shown. The latest plot reveals the number of policy makers who do not expect lift-off to happen in 2015 has risen from two to four. Thus, 13 of 17 Fed officials still expect a rate hike this year, which is down from 15 in the June plot. This is surprising considering the new wrinkle towards global growth uncertainty – if the Fed is now “officially” worried about the recent global growth uncertainty is it logical that two months of global data will be enough to alleviate that uncertainty so that they can raise interest rates at their December meeting?

There was yet another shocker in the dot plot. For the first time ever, one Fed policy maker is forecasting negative rates for this year and next (highlighted in red on the dot plot). During the post meeting press conference, Chair Yellen was asked about negative rates and she said that negative rates were not "something we seriously considered" at the current juncture. However, she didn't rule it out – “I don’t expect that we’re going to be in a path of providing additional accommodation. But if the outlook were to change in a way that most of my colleagues and I do not expect, and we found ourselves with a weak economy that needed additional stimulus, we would look at all of our available tools. And that would be something that we would evaluate in that kind of context.”

The implications from all of this are that other foreign central bankers may be forced into further action. With the Fed on hold, dovish central banks may want to ensure that the Fed’s inaction doesn't jeopardize their own domestic inflation targets – thereby setting off another round of monetary easing in the ongoing currency wars.

Why the Fed HAS to Consider the Global Economy

From CNBC found here.

Operating within an economic system where the foreign trade sector represents nearly one-third of demand and output, the Fed must carefully consider price and activity effects coming from the rest of the world. This year, for example, an estimated foreign trade deficit of more than $500 billion is expected to reduce America's economic growth by an entire percentage point. That is because the strong domestic demand – consisting of private consumption, residential investments, business capital outlays and public spending - is stimulating the purchases of foreign goods and services, while the weak economies in the rest of the world, and a strong dollar, are holding back American export sales.

External price effects on American inflation developments are equally strong and straightforward. Driven by a 13.3 percent decline in fuel costs, import prices in the year to August fell 11.4 percent. The non-fuel prices also declined 3 percent, marking their largest drop since October 2009. As a result of that, the headline index of consumer prices (CPI) rose only 0.2 percent in the twelve months to August. But, over the same period, price gains in sectors sheltered from international competition – approximated by the core CPI - edged up 1.8 percent, maintaining the rate of increase observed since the middle of last year.

That enormous difference between the headline and the core rates of inflation shows the strength of externally-induced effects on American costs and prices. And the U.S. inflation story does not end there. What was discussed so far are just the first-round external effects on the domestic price formation process. The second-round effects are arguably even stronger and more pervasive, because an open trading system and declining import prices exercise a vigorous restraint on the pricing power in a broad range of American industries. All this shows how America's foreign trade transactions directly impact the Fed's ability to fulfil its mandate of full employment and price stability.

Employment, in particular, is a difficult part of the mandate. Monetarists have often objected to that. They argue that the monetary policy can only provide an environment of price stability in which demand, output and employment creation can take place. But the mandate is still there, and employment is always a politically-charged issue. Consider, for example, the fact that the current labor market numbers are not as good as implied by the reported 5.1 percent unemployment rate.
Adding 6.5 million involuntary part-time workers (people working part-time because they cannot get a full-time job) and 1.8 million people who are marginally attached to the labor force (mainly people who quit looking for a job because they could not find one), gives an actual unemployment rate that is more than double the official 5.1 percent rate. That also means that the actual number of unemployed is 16.3 million, rather than the reported 8 million. The high numbers of America's long-term unemployed (people out of work for 27 months and over) are reflecting current labor market difficulties as well. These numbers have been increasing since last June to reach 2.2 million at the end of August, accounting for nearly one-third of the reported unemployment.

A similar note about America's soft labor markets is sounded by average hourly earnings; they were roughly unchanged over the three months to August. Now, let's bring back into discussion that 1 percentage point that our foreign trade deficit will knock off the growth of our domestic demand. Even the convinced free traders – of which I am one – have to admit that the immediate effect of that will be job losses in our import-competing industries. The long-term dynamic effects of free trade may well be positive for the world economy as a whole, but that is of little consolation to retrenched workers and bankrupt companies.

The Fed's critics, and American bankers threatening to begin laying people off if the Fed does not promptly oblige with higher interest rates, should understand that there is nothing the U.S. monetary authorities can do about Asians' unrelenting quest for export-led growth, and the European chaos of mean fiscal austerity policies and biblical refugee crises. There is also nothing the Fed can do about structural problems in U.S. labor markets. Only broad and active structural policies – e.g., better and more affordable education, labor force retraining and relocation – could make more people employable in an economy which, thanks to the Fed, is already pushing well above its physical limits to growth.

Foreign trade and labor market policies are the responsibilities of the federal government.
It is not up to the Fed to negotiate better market access to American companies in foreign countries, or to make sure through various G forums (G7, G20, etc.) and multilateral organizations, such as the IMF and the OECD, that economic policies are properly coordinated in order to ensure a fair and a more balanced international trade. And neither is it the Fed's fault that East Asia and the euro area are currently running trade surpluses of $700 billion and $320 billion, respectively, and acting as a huge drag on world economy – extracting that 1 percentage-point gift from the growth of the U.S. domestic demand.

The Fed just has to compose with all that, and to calibrate its policy in order to minimize the negative
effects on U.S. growth and employment of this extremely unbalanced situation in global trade flows. The sad part is that none of these vitally important issues for American economy and security are even mentioned, let alone debated, in the presidential primaries of either party – except for some rather folkloric utterances by Donald Trump, who keeps screaming "they are robbing us blind," and who would treat the Chinese president to a Big Mac instead of a glittering state dinner at the White House.

Somebody has to mind the store. It is easy to criticize the Fed for everything, especially if the Dow does not keep soaring. But the Fed's critics have to understand that economic growth, employment creation and a sound investment environment are a result of an entire policy mix - monetary, fiscal and structural (or regulatory) policies – that is supposed to guide an open economy toward an optimal utilization of its (physical) capital and labor resources.

Having missed the September deadline for the Fed's interest rate increase, the wise-guys are now taking what they call "a December liftoff" as an obvious certainty. Investors, as opposed to traders, should pay no attention to that. People confidently predicting a September rate hike have shown that they can't even read an open book that is called the Fed. The Fed will exercise its mandate as a function of events whose outcome is unknowable ex-ante. The Fed is watching these events like the rest of us. When the data begin signaling the desirability of a policy change, the Fed will adjust its instruments in a manner that will carefully prepare its next move.

So far, the Fed sees nothing that would warrant that kind of action.

Keep Calm and Have a Fortune Cookie

The last week we saw the Chinese government force the devaluation of their currency by 4.4% in an effort to inject life into their economy after their recent market crash. This started a frenzy of protest on Main St. and Wall St. alike. Both sides of the political aisle in the U.S. claimed this currency manipulation by the Chinese will further weaken U.S. exports. Although it's relieving to see bipartisan action, we would like to highlight this event and others that our readers and clients should also focus on in world markets.

Chinese devaluing their currency, effectively making their products more affordable to the rest of the world, was a foregone conclusion with the recent strength of the US dollar. In March, the Euro hit an all-time high against the Yuan at 0.15274 due to the Yuan's peg to the strong US Dollar. The Eurozone is virtually the same in importance to Chinese exports as the U.S. market. The PBoC devaluation in China to protect their exports has a similar effect to low interest rates and the bond buy-back (quantitative easing) in major markets.

The declining economies in Europe and Japan have caused both central banks to print money and embark on massive bond buying programs. This helped jump start both economies and also devalued their respective currencies. Japan saw over 3% GDP growth but also saw some of the lowest levels in their currency since 2007, closing at less than 124 JPY per US dollar Friday, August 14. This made Japanese exports even more attractive, and lucky enough for Japan, global commodities are so low their cheap currency didn’t hamper growth. Look for Japanese intervention to increase the value of their currency if commodity prices rebound. Virtually the same can be said for the Eurozone.

Funny enough, the move in the Chinese currency caused such speculation that it would hurt U.S. exports, the top performing major currency last week was the EUR, gaining 1.34% over the USD hitting over 1.1150. This month-long high for the Euro and increase in strength for the GBP and CHF was likely aided by the multi-billion dollar deal approved by the Greek parliament to finalize their bailout. Even though the EU only grew 0.3% this quarter (projected 0.4%), the perceived stabilization of the region was enough to convince the market of its relative strength.

With a pending rate decision in the U.S. in September, low commodity prices and shaky global markets, be on the lookout for more government intervention by regions globally. Closer to home, take a look at the article below for some signals coming this week of what might happen in September.

Hints of a Fed Rate Hike Could Come This Week

Today’s release offers one of the early estimates of the macro trend in August. Although the data is focused on the New York Fed’s region within the U.S., the report is the first of several regional updates on manufacturing activity from the Fed banks. As usual, this data will set the tone for expectations for the monthly figures that will follow in the weeks ahead.

In addition, today’s report will be widely read as the first clue of the week for assessing the potential that Yellen & Co. will begin raising interest rates in September for the first time since 2006. The odds that tighter policy is set to begin with next months’ Federal Open Market Committee meeting draw fresh support in last week’s optimistic news on retail sales and industrial output for July. More of the same is expected for the initial peek at August’s profile.

According to consensus forecast from www.econoday.com, the NY Fed Index is on track for a modest rise to 4.75 for this month. If the calculation holds, the benchmark will tick up to its highest level since March. In turn, the news will offer the throng of analysts another reason to think that we'll see a rate hike next month.

Last week’s key economic updates – industrial production and retail sales – delivered positive news. In both cases, strong gains for July marked a turnaround from disappointing comparisons through most of the first half of the year. Are the encouraging numbers a sign that the macro trend is poised to deliver stronger growth in the second half of the year? Those of you in manufacturing know the answer just by looking at your order pipeline.

The view from the perspective of home builders is certainly optimistic these days. In the July update, the mood was clearly resilient. The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) remained unchanged at 60 in July, sticking to the highest reading in nearly a decade. “The fact that builder confidence has returned to levels not seen since 2005 shows that housing continues to improve at a steady pace,” NAHB’s chairman Tom Woods said last month. “As we head into the second half of 2015, we should expect a continued recovery of the housing market.”

The bullish narrative is projected to remain intact in today’s release for August. At www.briefing.com, the consensus estimate sees HMI rising fractionally to 61, which would mark another multi-year high. In that case, we’ll have another clue for expecting upbeat news in tomorrow’s report on residential housing construction.

Puzzled?

Earlier this month we speculated that the Bank of Canada could cut interest rates after the negative April GDP print; and in last week’s blog post we said that we would be shocked if the BOC didn’t cut because of the string of negative data point after the disappointing April GDP report. Faced with a firestorm of recession talk, the BOC had no choice but to cut interest rates by 25bp to 0.5%. The CAD was promptly sold hard to six years lows. The price action far exceeded our expectations especially after the BOC raised the possibility of QE, if necessary, indicating that this move may not be the end of its easing campaign.

Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz refrained from using the R word by stating that "real GDP is now projected to have contracted modestly in the first half of the year." The BOC also lowered its 2015 growth forecast from 1.9% to 1.1%. For 2016, it expects the economy to grow by 2.3% versus a previous forecast of 2.5%. The economy is not expected to return to full capacity until 2017. As for inflation, the underlying estimate is now 1.5% instead of 1.7%. As you might imagine, the decline in the price of crude oil was the major culprit in the adjusted forecasts.

In the press conference after the policy announcement, Governor Poloz said two things that really
stand out and didn’t seem to receive enough press. He mentioned that he was puzzled that the weaker CAD failed to improve non-energy exports. This statement struck a chord with us because two other countries have had that similar experience. The weak yen has not caused a surge in Japanese exports. Similarly, the weak euro has also not caused an increase in exports as evidenced in the recent Eurozone May trade figures which showed that exports fell 1.5%. We are not sure why this would be puzzling – after all, central banks are engaged in a currency war and no country can gain an advantage if all central banks are counter acting other bank’s moves with matching simulative monetary policy measures.

The other thing that Poloz said was that he expected the Canadian economy to be less in sync with that of the U.S. Are the economic cycles of the two nations that much out of sync? Many economists certainly think so – according to a recent survey in the Wall Street Journal, 82% of economists expect a Fed hike in September. If that is the case, the CAD is in for way more downside that anyone currently expects.

Still the One

With Greece and the Chinese stock market off the front pages, safe haven flows subsided and the monetary divergence theme reasserted itself as the driving force in the currency markets. Last week, the GBP was the top performer as positive economic data, including accelerating employment earnings, and a chorus of Bank of England members sounding more hawkish about a rate hike. This caused the timing of a UK rate hike to move from Q2 2016 to Q1. Having said this, the U.S. is still the one. No, we are not referring to the 70s soft rock ballad by Orleans but rather the only major central bank that is on course to raise interest rates in 2015. Federal Reserve Chairwomen Janet Yellen was on Capitol Hill last week and she stuck with her script by reaffirming that the central bank was on track to raise interest rates this year. If you remember, this is the very same driving force that prevailed in January of this year as the rate hikers were the top performers while the rest of the countries were moving in the opposite direction.

Apart from the central banks of the US and UK, the other major central banks have either a neutral bias or are in easing mode. The ECB left its policy unchanged at last week’s meeting and reaffirmed that the conditions of low inflation remain. Thus, its policy of bond purchase will remain in place. The Bank of Japan also had its meeting last week and it adjusted its inflation forecast – it no longer expects to hit its inflation target until after 2018 which means that it may need to apply more stimuli in meetings to come.

China reported a slew of key economic indicators last week, including Q2 GDP. It announced that its quarterly GDP came in right on target at 7%, like it always does. However, this time the chorus of investors responding with disbelief was louder than ever. No one believes their data anymore. Leaving this aside, China will probably need to administer more stimulus but more importantly their economy is not growing like it was, which is putting tremendous pressure on commodity prices and the economies of the countries that produce them – Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. Australia was the best performer of the countries in easing mode mainly because their next central bank meeting isn’t until the beginning of August. New Zealand was the worst performer because their next central bank meeting is next Wednesday; and after last week’s disastrous dairy auction, the odds have increased dramatically that the RBNZ will cut rates by 50 bps instead of 25 bps.

Tony Valente
Fred Maurer

Allusion of Ever-Present Peril

Flippity-Flop

The highlight of last week was the release of the Fed minutes from the FOMC meeting on January 28th 2015

The FOMC statement from that meeting left a hawkish impression on the market, however, the minutes showed that Fed members were much more cautious, with many members saying they were inclined to stay at zero for longer. Members expressed concern that raising interest rates too soon could pour cold water on the U.S. economic recovery, and fretted over the impact of dropping "patient" from the central bank's rate guidance. Members also grappled with the weakness in international markets as well as worrying about falling inflation expectations in the U.S.

The flippity-flop in terms of the perception of the Fed’s first interest rate increase has had a hand in sidelining the USD as of late. The market will now look towards Fed Chair Janet Yellen’s testimony before Congress next week for insight into what the Fed is thinking. If Yellen comes across as hawkish then the market will expect a rate hike at the June meeting. However, if Yellen takes pains to explain the risks from a prolonged decline in inflation and the uncertainty in the international outlook then the uncertainty in the Fed’s first interest rate hike will continue to dog the USD.

Sword of Damocles

 

Finance ministers from the 19 countries comprising the Euro group has granted Greece a critical 4-month extension to its massive debt bailout so that officials can work out a longer term deal thereby prolonging the state of looming disaster for the shaky economic union. After trading many jabs and insults, it is safe to say that the easy parts of the negotiations are over. The deal won’t go into effect until the various national legislatures around Europe have approved it.

In some countries, particularly the Netherlands and Europe, this will be a tough sell. Understandably, some countries are frustrated at seeing their euros flow into a country whose economy never seems to improve.

The deal will mean that Greece will temporarily avoid going bankrupt as their financial lifeline is extended for 4 months. It should also mean that capital controls will not be needed and that Greek banks will have enough money to stock up their ATM’s. However, to get the money, the Greek government has one more hurdle to clear, which is to present a series of unspecified economic reforms measures that are deemed acceptable by creditors and rooted in Greece's previously enacted bailout agreement – something the government had promised not to do. Greece’s Prime Minister, Alexis Tsipras, now has to sell the Brussels deal and an eventual long-term agreement with the Eurozone not only to voters, but to Syriza's left wing and his junior coalition partner, the right-wing Independent Greeks.

These economic reforms should have been presented at the time of this writing. Notably, the Greek government will be the author of the reforms pursued, which has a rallying cry for the Syriza Party during Greek election campaigning. This represents a change from the past 5 years when Greece has relied on rescue money to avoid going bankrupt and was effectively ordered to enact a series of austerity measures by Berlin and Brussels.